Here's a timelapse I made of the snow in my (new!) backyard in Brooklyn of the snow today from 9:10 a.m. to about 5:30 p.m. (when I ran out of daylight):

Embedded video doesn't work in most RSS readers, so you may have to check out the original post.

Set to the first 11 seconds of Regina Spektor's "20 Years of Snow." Of course.

And, clearly, it's an homage to the much more interesting Washington, D.C. Blizzard in 30 Seconds:

I doubt you'll see this one in your reader either. Try the original post.

Snow: Fun! Pretty! Until the slush tomorrow, that is…

It's February! The month of Valentine's Day and the Super Bowl; the shortest, coldest month of the year in the Northern Hemisphere; and, yes, the month named for the whips that pagans once cut from the animals they sacrificed, which were used to whip girls and women in celebration of the nascent Valentine's Day holiday known as Lupercalia.

In other words, what's not to love? And I, for one, received a delightful Valentine's month surprise when I discovered that my broken heart/valid heart t-shirts are featured in not one, but two (!) Treasury Wests (Treasuries West?) on Etsy (both, alas, now expired):

Valentine Humbug by Silver Sisters Studio

for the broken hearted by Knot Original

Whee! Well, consider this your reminder to get a shirt (or, hell, a broken-hearted robot, it's pretty freakin' cute) for your favorite geek for Valentine's Day.

</3

If you've been missing kenspeckly posts full of nerdy thoughts on the tubes, take a look-see at this post I just wrote for the outside.in blog about the ways Google Fast Flip misses the point in its attempt to innovate aggregation and UX of online news consumption.

If you haven't heard about Fast Flip yet, check out The Official Google Blog announcement.

Snip of my thoughts:

The product claims to bring the experience of reading a magazine online, but the interface more closely resembles that of a microfiche machine (hat tip to Outiside.in Biz Dev VP Camilla Cho for the observation) and provides neither the physical immediacy of print nor standard web conventions to guide users through content.

My fave project in the ITP Spring Show last night was definitely AL-gorithm by Alex Kaufmann (seemingly unlinkable).

Wanting to experience language the way a computer does—as meaningless packets of information—Alex printed up 22 copies of his favorite passage of All the King's Men and cut out all but every instance of a single letter on each sheet.

The finished product is 22 sheets of paper with seemingly random placements of a single letter that create the full passage when stacked on top of each other in any order.

The very best thing about this project—aside from the Brian Dettmer-esque OCD required to complete it—is that it's basically the opposite of Raymond Queneau's Hundred Thousand Billion Poems (see this great interactive version). Each unit of Hundred Thousand Billion Poems has its own meaning, but reordering the strips destroys the original meaning of the original poem (and rarely produces new coherent meaning)—and in AL-gorithm each page has no human-decipherable meaning, but reordering them preserves the original text. Cool!

The only thing it needs is a better title. How 'bout a quote from Queneau? "Oh reader thinking thus your heart will lock."

A little mechanical and electrical engineering porn [via Google Blogoscoped] to start the week off right:

Embedded video doesn't usually work in RSS readers or scrapers. Check out the actual post.

My fave part is when the technician goes into a container to swap out some hardware on a scooter, referred to by the narrator as his "Google-provided personal transportation device." Hilari!

We have this saying around the internetz, "links are the currency of the web." It's actually a bit of an understatement. Links transfer not only attention and authority, but also direction and meaning, helping us figure out where to go and what to expect when we get there.

"rusty chain" by shoothead on flickr

Links don't just transfer meaning directly, when visitors read the context of a link before following it, but also indirectly, through the relevance algorithms of every major search engine, which almost universally include anchor text, even after Google's 2007 algorithm update to diffuse the most blatant link bombs. As Google's webmaster tools explains it:

[Anchor text is] how Googlebot sees your site. [...] This information provides good insight into how your site is seen by others.

This simultaneous transfer of authority and meaning is something I thought about a lot when writing a reeeeeaaalllly long paper on how search engines construct authority, and it comes up again and again professionally when the name of a project I'm working on doesn't correspond directly to search queries I want to optimize it for. Turns out Google rewards boring product names as much as boring headlines.

Anyway, enough with the 2-to-3-year-old search engine links. My point is that the skyrocketing adoption of Twitter and the increased use of URL shorteners it necessitates are altering the dynamics of power and meaning in the link economy. Anecdotally, I've stopped posting anything to my del.icio.us account with the intent of actively encouraging my friends to visit those links. I still save bookmarks in del.icio.us for refindability and tag clouds of my interests, but if I want people to look at something I'm thinking about or working on, Twitter is far and away my first choice. For a larger-scale example, consider that traffic to Fred Wilson's blog from Twitter has tripled in the past three months, and of course, the hockey-stick traffic chart of Twitter itself.

Embedded charts don't show up in most RSS readers. Go check out the original post.

It's worth noting that, according to bit.ly stats (which I obsess over), a reasonable portion of the traffic I send to a link via Twitter comes from it updating my Facebook status—and, indeed, half of that Fred Wilson post I pointed to earlier is about the increased traffic to his blog from Facebook. But Facebook's walled garden approach means that search engine spiders can't find the links we're sharing there at all, so it's pointless to spend time thinking about Facebook in this regard.

my friend Anne Helmond in her avatar_nofollow picture on flickr (robots nofollow t-shirt)

Links shared on Twitter, however, are almost always public to spiders as well as humans. Even though Twitter disappointingly barred Google juice from passing through its fingers by adding the nofollow attribute to all tweeted links back in September, most search engines do follow nofollow links—and do use the anchor text in nofollow links to determine the relevancy of a page for the keywords its linked from—they just don't use links with a nofollow attribute to calculate the ranking with which they weight the page's authority generally. But shortened URLs shared on Twitter can't transfer meaning to humans or to spiders because Twitter doesn't allow its users to create links with anchor text.

This can lead to dubious hilarity: URL shorteners make it way easier to rickroll—I mean, rickroll—your friends. The deeper meaning of rickrolling, such as it is, is that neither the clicking human nor the spidering robot knows what to expect on the other side of the link.

"you've been rick-rolled!" by stovak on flickr

For humans who are not being rickrolled, the context of a Tweet usually tells them what to expect, but search engine bots are still at a loss for the meaning they usually retrieve from anchor links. This information is being collected by some URL shorteners—for instance, check out this bit.ly info page for a wikipedia article I recently tweeted—but it's not being passed on to search engines for use in determining relevancy.

This doesn't mean a doomsday for relevancy algorithms: Twitter may be starting to explode into the non-tech-elite world, but it's not outpacing anchor-link-friendly blogging yet.

If it does, I wonder how search engines will rework their relevancy algorithms to include "information on how [a] site is seen by others" in addition to the keywords its creators have planted on it.

Embedded charts don't show up in most RSS readers. Go check out the original post.

related: Check out this Hacker News thread on how URL shorteners are making money that was recently tweeted by my friend Aditya. Pretty interesting that there is no stunningly obvious business model for URL shorteners, despite their seeming positioning as brokers of the link economy. Those who are keeping thorough analytics on their short URLs (like bit.ly and cli.gs) are sitting on a gold mine of data, but it'll take serious work to monetize that information.

Yesterday at brunch it was suggested to me that the forward slash in my </3 t-shirt design (recently mentioned in Brooklyn Based and CRAFT Magazine's blog, yaaayy!) could be replaced by the symbol of Lacan's split subject, which is written as .

For those of you who were not self-loathing enough to take many literary theory or psychology classes, the split subject is just Lacan's morose notion that the subject (which generally means humans in the context of how we think and talk and write about ourselves and others as individuals) is always divided and alienated from itself.

I guess this would be a heart that's been broken and/or validated by our alienation from ourselves. Or by Lacan, whose writing once drove me to throw the four-pound Norton Anthology of Literary Criticism against walls.