<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: moldering M.A. thesis roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kenspeckle.net/blog/2007/06/06/search-authority-everything-is-miscellaneous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kenspeckle.net/blog/2007/06/06/search-authority-everything-is-miscellaneous/</link>
	<description>a humorous, hyperlinked look at language, internet culture, and anything conspicuous</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:00:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lauren</title>
		<link>http://kenspeckle.net/blog/2007/06/06/search-authority-everything-is-miscellaneous/comment-page-1/#comment-32176</link>
		<dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 01:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenspeckle.net/blog/2007/06/06/search-authority-everything-is-miscellaneous/#comment-32176</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I have to agree that statements seems exaggerated and outdated. 

But the (very overstated) point there is a general lack of understanding of the technology that brings us information. We snobby web folks have to remember sometimes that interest drives understanding, not just intelligence. People who don&#039;t have a particular interest in digital culture won&#039;t have any more understanding of search engines than we have of car engines.

And I think you *could* argue (though I don&#039;t necessarily with the argument I&#039;m about to propose) that from the light internet user&#039;s perspective the distinction between a browser and a search engine could be almost purely semantic: They open an application that shows them a search box (usually the out of box browser default page has some search element), they type, they click, they find. 

Personally, I just can&#039;t bring myself to believe a terribly large number of users perceive things that way, but the devil&#039;s advocate could argue it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I have to agree that statements seems exaggerated and outdated. </p>
<p>But the (very overstated) point there is a general lack of understanding of the technology that brings us information. We snobby web folks have to remember sometimes that interest drives understanding, not just intelligence. People who don't have a particular interest in digital culture won't have any more understanding of search engines than we have of car engines.</p>
<p>And I think you *could* argue (though I don't necessarily with the argument I'm about to propose) that from the light internet user's perspective the distinction between a browser and a search engine could be almost purely semantic: They open an application that shows them a search box (usually the out of box browser default page has some search element), they type, they click, they find. </p>
<p>Personally, I just can't bring myself to believe a terribly large number of users perceive things that way, but the devil's advocate could argue it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asim</title>
		<link>http://kenspeckle.net/blog/2007/06/06/search-authority-everything-is-miscellaneous/comment-page-1/#comment-31993</link>
		<dc:creator>Asim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 16:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenspeckle.net/blog/2007/06/06/search-authority-everything-is-miscellaneous/#comment-31993</guid>
		<description>On users&#039; understanding of search functionality, I couldnâ€™t disagree more. Maybe thatâ€™s referring to AOL users from 2002, but even then I think if you spent at least an hour on the internet in a day, you knew the difference between a search engine vs a browser. The argument can be conflated only if you consider the build-in searchbar in Firefox or the Google/Yahoo/etc. toolbar. Anyway, if you ask a 14-year-old what do you use to search, theyâ€™re going to say Google, not Yahoo or Ask. Hehe. 

What I want to know if how many people use embedded search in a particular site (such as the one to the left) to search the internet vs just the site itself. If I am browsing a site which has embedded search, Iâ€™m still more likely to go to the Firefox searchbar than use the embedded search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On users' understanding of search functionality, I couldnâ€™t disagree more. Maybe thatâ€™s referring to AOL users from 2002, but even then I think if you spent at least an hour on the internet in a day, you knew the difference between a search engine vs a browser. The argument can be conflated only if you consider the build-in searchbar in Firefox or the Google/Yahoo/etc. toolbar. Anyway, if you ask a 14-year-old what do you use to search, theyâ€™re going to say Google, not Yahoo or Ask. Hehe. </p>
<p>What I want to know if how many people use embedded search in a particular site (such as the one to the left) to search the internet vs just the site itself. If I am browsing a site which has embedded search, Iâ€™m still more likely to go to the Firefox searchbar than use the embedded search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
