<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: light criticism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kenspeckle.net/blog/2007/02/11/light-criticism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kenspeckle.net/blog/2007/02/11/light-criticism/</link>
	<description>a humorous, hyperlinked look at language, internet culture, and anything conspicuous</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:00:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lauren</title>
		<link>http://kenspeckle.net/blog/2007/02/11/light-criticism/comment-page-1/#comment-11324</link>
		<dc:creator>lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 22:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenspeckle.net/blog/2007/02/11/light-criticism/#comment-11324</guid>
		<description>The message leaves something to be desired, I&#039;ll give you that. It&#039;s nothing we haven&#039;t heard before. 

But I like the medium (&lt;em&gt;heavyweight cardboard on TV screen&lt;/em&gt;?). TV light looks much more interesting abstracted from its context. Maybe this would be more appealing if they&#039;d cut an interesting design into the cardboard instead of rhetoric.

I guess what we really need is our &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Headroom_Pirating_Incident&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;masked Max Headroom friend&lt;/a&gt; to hijack the signals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The message leaves something to be desired, I'll give you that. It's nothing we haven't heard before. </p>
<p>But I like the medium (<em>heavyweight cardboard on TV screen</em>?). TV light looks much more interesting abstracted from its context. Maybe this would be more appealing if they'd cut an interesting design into the cardboard instead of rhetoric.</p>
<p>I guess what we really need is our <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Headroom_Pirating_Incident" rel="nofollow">masked Max Headroom friend</a> to hijack the signals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://kenspeckle.net/blog/2007/02/11/light-criticism/comment-page-1/#comment-11316</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kenspeckle.net/blog/2007/02/11/light-criticism/#comment-11316</guid>
		<description>These guys are silly. Personally I&#039;m all for TV screens on streets and more creative hacking of them. &quot;Advertising = Graffiti&quot; = boring. Graffiti researchers need to do better if they want to compete with advertisers. What kind of battle is this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These guys are silly. Personally I'm all for TV screens on streets and more creative hacking of them. "Advertising = Graffiti" = boring. Graffiti researchers need to do better if they want to compete with advertisers. What kind of battle is this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
